Thursday, 3 May 2012

Greg Sheridan: Don't give aid to groups with terror connections

Don't give aid to groups with terror connections
Very important article by Greg Sheridan.
Are Tim and Peter Costello really brothers?


Tim Of World 'Visionless' below: Peter was indeed the word's best treasurer
for 10 years I guess.


Compare with Labor troglodytes like Swan et al.


GS


Don't give aid to groups with terror connections

AUSTRALIAN taxpayers should not be forced to fund organisations with links to terrorists. This is the case with aid to at least one Palestinian group. It's not against the law, but it's wrong. It's morally and politically objectionable. It ought to stop.
The Australian government aid agency, Ausaid, gives millions of dollars, through the private charity World Vision, to the Union of Agricultural Work Committees, which works in the Gaza Strip. The problem is the UAWC and its personnel have deep links with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
The PFLP is a proscribed terrorist organisation under the relevant UN list, Australian legislation and the legislation of numerous other countries. It is one of the central progenitors of modern terrorism.
It was founded by George Habash and combined Arab nationalism with radical Marxist-Leninism. Its fortunes have waxed and waned as more direct Islamism has become dominant


  1. It pioneered aeroplane hijackings but then in the 1980s focused on assassinating Israeli civilians and moderate Arabs.
    UAWC was founded in 1986 as part of the "institutional cluster of the PFLP" as a State Department report in the 1990s described it. The report said: "The PFLP's agricultural extension activities are provided by the UAWC".
    The general, pro-Palestinian histories of the UAWC that I could find made no secret of the PFLP connection.

    It is true that the UAWC is not a proscribed terrorist organisation; nor are its leaders proscribed individuals. And it seems that it does peaceful civilian work.
    A few months ago a group of Israeli lawyers, Shurat HaDin, sent a complaint to Ausaid and World Vision charging that these bodies could be in breach of the law because support for UAWC could be easily construed as indirect support for a terrorist organisation.
    I think that overstates the legal case but I think the moral and political case against funding the UAWC is overwhelming.
    Ausaid asked World Vision to investigate and World Vision conducted searches of registers of all proscribed organisations, as well as talking directly to UAWC and others on the ground in the Palestinian territories. Ausaid and World Vision then wrote to Shurat HaDin saying there was no evidence they were breaking the law by funding UAWC. Both organisations took the allegations seriously enough to briefly suspend the funding to UAWC.
    Shurat HaDin then sent further information which Ausaid, with the assistance of other government agencies, is now evaluating.
    In response to my inquiries, World Vision issued a statement saying, in part: "UAWC is a registered NGO with both the Israeli Ministry of Justice and the Palestinian Authority. World Vision is not UAWC's only partner. UAWC has partnered with multiple other government aid programs and United Nations agencies. These partners include UN agencies (such as UNDP), World Bank, and numerous international not-for-profit organisations."
    World Vision also says it exercises all reasonable efforts to vet organisations it partners with. Ausaid says that since 2005 it has provided $4.7 million for UAWC through World Vision. I do not accuse either World Vision or Ausaid of bad faith. However, I do not believe Australian taxes should go to support organisations associated with terrorism.
    In its dossier, Shurat HaDin points out that "the president of the UAWC board of directors, Bashir al Kheiri, is a well-known and senior member of the PFLP, (one-time) head of the PFLP Political Office in Ramallah, with a long record of arrests and jail time in Israel for terrorist involvement and still actively representing the PFLP as recently as January 2012".
    It further says: "The vice-president of the UAWC board of directors, Jamil Muhammad Ismail al-Majdalawi, is also a well-known and senior member of the PFLP . . . and represents the PFLP on the PLO central committee."
    It provides information about three other UAWC board members linking them to the PFLP.
    In the Palestinian territories, it can be difficult to work effectively on the ground and not rub shoulders with people who have terrorist associations. But the answer is not to co-operate with organisations linked to terrorist outfits that espouse violence and hatred, as does the PFLP. Specific renunciation of such attitudes must be a prerequisite to receiving Australian aid.
    It is, in any event, foolish for Australia to be making this effort. The Rudd and Gillard governments have doubled Australian aid to the Palestinian territories, and Palestinians in nearby areas, to $70m annually. There is more than a whiff of this being an effort, hopefully forlorn, to placate the Arab vote in the run-up to our ill-advised effort to secure a non-permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
    But it is also an example of the wider malaise in our aid program. The decision to wildly increase the aid program, $5 billion now and set to double in the next few years if the Gillard government keeps its promises, means we cannot spend the money properly, productively or prudently.
    I asked Teresa Gambaro, the opposition's development assistance spokeswoman, about the UAWC.
    She said: "It would appear that Ausaid is providing funds to World Vision to fund an organisation that has links to a terrorist organisation. For Ausaid to come back and say there is nothing wrong is totally unacceptable. This is a situation where World Vision has partnered with another organisation in a third-party arrangement. It seems evident that there is a total lack of transparency and inadequate reporting requirements on NGOs."
    Regarding the aid budget more generally, Gambaro argues: "Australia's aid program is on schedule to be doubled and I am deeply concerned that there is not the capacity even now to make sure this money is appropriately and effectively spent."
    For decades we have denied aid to people often on the brink of starvation -- among them North Koreans and Burmese -- because we quite rightly object to their governments. Whatever Australian taxes are for, they are not to support organisations with links to terrorist groups. This is just one example of many of how parts of our aid budget have spun bizarrely out of control and no longer reflect majority Australian values



    ##########################################################

    Excellent site!

    http://theblankpagesoftheage.blogspot.com.au/

    ############################################################


    Don't give aid to groups with terror connections | The Australian 

    www.theaustralian.com.au/.../dont-give-aid-to-groups-with-terror-...
    Don't give aid to groups with terror connections. by: Greg Sheridan; From: The Australian; May 03, 2012 12:00AM. Increase Text Size · Decrease Text Size · Print ...

Climate death threats fraudulent:OFFICIAL!! - scam by climate lunatics

Climate death threats fraudulent: OFFICIAL!!

 #########################################################################
----- Original Message -----
From: g87
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:43 AM
Subject: Climate death threats fraudulent: OFFICIAL!!

 
Climate death threats fraudulent: OFFICIAL!! 

The Australian Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke  - main banner headline -May 3
It confirms what common sense would have told us: there were no threats to any climate scientists - simply because there was never any suggestion that the police were investigating it!
I not only asked the Federal police to confirm if any investigation was extant, but also emailed the relevant scientists informing them that there was no police involvement.
All entreaties for a response was ignored.

Radio 3AW leftist son Peter Meagher  [part - time replacement for the then sick Derryn Hinch] abused me on air a few about a year ago when I told him so.

Not only do 'warmed' scientists  regularly discredit themselves -  opprobrium is then heaped on their shamefull, obscenely named 'deniers.' This is yet another infamous scandal which taints with odious dishonour the religion of Climate warmists.

And we are paying the wages of these people - who instead of trying to cure cancer - spend their time humiliating themselves and  holding us in manifest contempt.
Watch how the true believers will try to flick aside this merely latest stigma to their self -  tattered / tainted reputations.
There are too many examplars.

Michael Mann and James Hansen have similarly excused the East Anglia fraud and the Mann's favourite discredited 'Hockey stick' syndrome.
Why - Mann humiliated himself on the ABC's Lateline on 15/3/12
Hansen still insists that the East Anglia  ''scandal has no effect on the science.''

I bet!
When we have a world  wherein the world of Climate lunacy - absolute truth is not needed.

Climate science is a scam: as if we did not already know it!
It takes a lot to partially replace Gillard's disasters on the front page: I reckon Julia engjineered it. Surely she will draw yet 'another line in the sand.'


But she will march into the valley of the incipient political death with her asinine, misnamed Carbon Tax.
We are living in interesting times: our grandchildren need a context to help them understand what it was like puting up with the greatest scam in history!

Even the ABC is reporting it!
GS

Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
 

  1. 15 Mar 2012 – Climatologist and director of the Earth System Science Centre in Pennsylvania State University Michael Mann joins Lateline.
  2. Michael Mann's cosy chat on ABC's Lateline | Australian Climate ...

    www.australianclimatemadness.com/.../michael-manns-cosy-chat-on-...
    16 Mar 2012 – UPDATE: Baldrick in the comments reminds ACM of Tony Jones' hostile and patronising interrogation of Ian Plimer on Lateline in April 2009.



####################################################################

  1. Climatic Research Unit email controversy - Wikipedia, the free ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy
    The University of East Anglia stated that the server from which the data were taken .....James Hansen said that the controversy has "no effect on the science" and ...... How the 'climategate' scandal is bogus and based on climate sceptics' lies".
  2. Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation ...

    www.telegraph.co.uk › Comment › Columnists › Christopher Booker
    28 Nov 2009 – Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation ...by the leaked emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research ... Gavin Schmidt, right-hand man to Al Gore's ally Dr James Hansen, ... to uphold those principles which lie at the heart of genuine scientific enquiry and debate.
  3. Climategate: Warmist conspiracy exposed? | Herald Sun Andrew ...

    blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.../hadley_hacked/
    8.15 PM UPDATE: The Hadley University of East Anglia CRU director admits. ... So the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most ...Thomas R Karl , Gavin Schmidt , James Hansen , Michael Oppenheimer ..... I don't consider that the Hadley Centre should be protected in lying, but the ...


######################################################################




I




################################################################################################################################################################

  1. News for Climate scientists' claim of email death ...

    1. Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke

      The Australian‎ - 8 hours ago
      Timothy Pilgrim was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that ...


      ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    1. http://abcnewswatch.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/death-threat-beat-up.html


      ABC News Watch: Death threat beat up

      abcnewswatch.blogspot.com/2012/05/death-threat-beat-up.html
      1 hour ago – Report in today's Australian Newspaper: Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke "CLAIMS that some of Australia's ...


      ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

      HEALTH AND SCIENCE

      Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke

      CLAIMS that some of Australia's leading climate change scientists were subjected to death threats as part of a vicious and unrelenting email campaign have been debunked by the Privacy Commissioner.
      Timothy Pilgrim was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that Australian National University climate change researchers were facing the ongoing campaign and had been moved to "more secure buildings" following explicit threats.
      In a six-page ruling made last week, Mr Pilgrim found that 10 of 11 documents, all emails, "do not contain threats to kill" and the other "could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat".
      Chief Scientist Ian Chubb, who was the ANU's vice-chancellor at the time, last night admitted he did not have any recollection of reading the emails before relocating the university's researchers. "I don't believe I did," Professor Chubb told The Australian.
      Rec Coverage 28 Day pass
      Instead, he said he had responded "as a responsible employer".
      "I had a bunch of concerned staff and they thought they should be moved to a more secure place so I moved them," he said.
      "With hindsight, we can say nobody chased them down. What do you do?"
      The FOI application was lodged by Sydney climate blogger Simon Turnill. It requested the release of "emails, transcript of telephone calls or messages that contained abuse, threats to kill and/or threats of harm to the recipient" sent to six staff members of the ANU's Climate Change Institute. His request resulted in the discovery of the 11 documents.
      The university refused to release the documents, citing a clause in the Freedom of Information Act that exempts documents that "would, or could reasonably be expected to ... endanger the life or physical safety of any person" from disclosure.
      Mr Turnill appealed against the decision.
      In response to the appeal, Mr Pilgrim found 10 documents did not contain threats to kill or threats of harm.
      Mr Pilgrim said of the 11th, a further email offering an account of an exchange that occurred at an off-campus event sponsored by members of the Climate Change Institute and other bodies: "I consider the danger to life or physical safety in this case to be only a possibility, not a real chance."
      Instead, he found "the exchange as described in the email could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat".
      The commissioner noted in his decision that Mr Turnill had confirmed he was not seeking "the release of personal information about the people who sent or received the emails or were referred to in calls or messages".
      Mr Pilgrim has ordered edited version of the documents to be released. "There is no evidence to suggest disclosure would, or could reasonably be expected to, endanger the life or physical safety of any person," he said.
      The commissioner noted that the emails "contain insulting and offensive language" and expressed fears "there is a risk that the release of the documents could lead to further insulting or offensive communication being directed at ANU personnel or expressed through social media".
      But Mr Pilgrim also found: "Even if the threats were highly credible, the question would be how release of the documents would add to the expected threat."
      ANU Climate Institute director Will Steffen, who is also one of the government's Climate Commissioners, is believed to have been a target of the emails. Professor Steffen was overseas yesterday and unavailable for comment.
      The ANU has until later this month to appeal against the commissioner's decision.
      A university spokesman said it stood by its decision to oppose the release of the documents.
      "We are reviewing the Privacy Commissioner's decision and considering our response," he said.
      Professor Chubb said he believed the tenor of the climate debate was improving.
      "I don't get the sense that there's the same level of nastiness," he said.
      But he insisted "we should keep the debate civil and not threaten or intimidate whether the threats are physical violence or death".

      ###################################################################################################################

      its our ABC.

      Thursday, May 3, 2012


      Death threat beat up



      We covered ABC's headline from June 4 2011: Death threats sent to top climate scientists in the following post: Death threats a beat up


      Report in today's Australian Newspaper confirms early suspicions: Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke
      "CLAIMS that some of Australia's leading climate change scientists were subjected to death threats as part of a vicious and unrelenting email campaign have been debunked by the Privacy Commissioner."
      How long will it take ABC to provide an update?


      Congratulations to Simon Turnill for persisting with an FOI request that lifted the covers on these exaggerated claims. Congratulations also to the Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim who according to The Australian "was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that Australian National University climate change researchers were facing the ongoing campaign and had been moved to "more secure buildings" following explicit threats.
      In a six-page ruling made last week, Mr Pilgrim found that 10 of 11 documents, all emails, "do not contain threats to kill" and the other "could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat".

      If only our own FOI requests met with similar success!





    Wednesday, 2 May 2012

    Julia Gillard intuitively behaves irrationally.

    Vale Labor madness.


    The extreme leftist Julia Gillard intuitively behaves irrationally.
    It is the way she is.
    Notice however that her fellow luvvies, whilst pathetically criticising her for not being able to ''sell her policies'' -  simultaneously claim that because she is a woman she ''needs clear air.''


    Nirvana will unfold in their tiny minds via the astonishing hype based hope that things will turn around if they wait for the carbon tax to get acceptance, wait for the budget and all sorts of asinine evidence - vitiated twirpery and toothfairy based forlorn furphies.


    Never does the thought seemingly occur to these deniers of evidence - based reality that it is Gillard, her scores of disasters and  their constant spin in all portfolios, asinine economically irrational policies and their lack of credibility with voters that is the problem.


    Someone recently wrote that ''the left has never won a rational argument.'' Indeed: how could they when it is with pride phrases like economic rationalism are reconfigured!


    So I put to you that the left are naturally stupid.
    It is the way they are.


    They will again soon change leaders via their favourite infantile musical - chairs game; but the new / old leader will try merely claim 'clean air.' Nothing will change.


    It is the way of their  post - modernist madness - wherein there is no absolute truth or logic.


    GS