#########################################################################
----- Original Message -----
From: g87
To: the australian
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:43 AM
Subject: Climate death threats fraudulent: OFFICIAL!!
Climate death threats fraudulent: OFFICIAL!!
The
Australian Climate
scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke - main banner headline
-May 3
It
confirms what common sense would have told us: there were no threats to any
climate scientists - simply because there was never any suggestion that the
police were investigating it!
I
not only asked the Federal police to confirm if any investigation was extant,
but also emailed the relevant scientists informing them that there was no police
involvement.
All
entreaties for a response was ignored.
Radio
3AW leftist son Peter Meagher [part - time replacement for the then sick Derryn
Hinch] abused me on air a few about a year ago when I told him so.
Not
only do 'warmed' scientists regularly discredit themselves - opprobrium is
then heaped on their shamefull, obscenely named 'deniers.' This is yet another
infamous scandal which taints with odious dishonour the religion of Climate
warmists.
And
we are paying the wages of these people - who instead of trying to cure cancer -
spend their time humiliating themselves and holding us in manifest
contempt.
Watch
how the true believers will try to flick aside this merely latest stigma to
their self - tattered / tainted reputations.
There
are too many examplars.
Michael
Mann and James Hansen have similarly excused the East Anglia fraud and the
Mann's favourite discredited 'Hockey stick' syndrome.
Why
- Mann humiliated himself on the ABC's Lateline on 15/3/12
Hansen
still insists that the East Anglia ''scandal has no effect on the
science.''
I
bet!
When
we have a world wherein the world of Climate lunacy - absolute truth is not
needed.
Climate
science is a scam: as if we did not already know it!
It
takes a lot to partially replace Gillard's disasters on the front page: I reckon
Julia engjineered it. Surely she will draw yet 'another line in the sand.'
But
she will march into the valley of the incipient political death with her
asinine, misnamed Carbon Tax.
We
are living in interesting times: our grandchildren need a context to help them
understand what it was like puting up with the greatest scam in history!
Even the ABC is reporting it!
GS
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
- 15 Mar 2012 – Climatologist and director of the Earth System Science Centre in Pennsylvania State University Michael Mann joins Lateline.
Michael Mann's cosy chat on ABC's Lateline | Australian Climate ...
www.australianclimatemadness.com/.../michael-manns-cosy-chat-on-...16 Mar 2012 – UPDATE: Baldrick in the comments reminds ACM of Tony Jones' hostile and patronising interrogation of Ian Plimer on Lateline in April 2009.
####################################################################
Climatic Research Unit email controversy - Wikipedia, the free ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversyThe University of East Anglia stated that the server from which the data were taken .....James Hansen said that the controversy has "no effect on the science" and ...... How the 'climategate' scandal is bogus and based on climate sceptics' lies".Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation ...
www.telegraph.co.uk › Comment › Columnists › Christopher Booker28 Nov 2009 – Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation ...by the leaked emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research ... Gavin Schmidt, right-hand man to Al Gore's ally Dr James Hansen, ... to uphold those principles which lie at the heart of genuine scientific enquiry and debate.Climategate: Warmist conspiracy exposed? | Herald Sun Andrew ...
blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.../hadley_hacked/8.15 PM UPDATE: The Hadley University of East Anglia CRU director admits. ... So the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most ...Thomas R Karl , Gavin Schmidt , James Hansen , Michael Oppenheimer ..... I don't consider that the Hadley Centre should be protected in lying, but the ...
######################################################################
################################################################################################################################################################
News for Climate scientists' claim of email death ...
- Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke
The Australian - 8 hours agoTimothy Pilgrim was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that ...
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
http://abcnewswatch.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/death-threat-beat-up.html
ABC News Watch: Death threat beat up
abcnewswatch.blogspot.com/2012/05/death-threat-beat-up.html1 hour ago – Report in today's Australian Newspaper: Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke "CLAIMS that some of Australia's ...
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////Timothy Pilgrim was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that Australian National University climate change researchers were facing the ongoing campaign and had been moved to "more secure buildings" following explicit threats.In a six-page ruling made last week, Mr Pilgrim found that 10 of 11 documents, all emails, "do not contain threats to kill" and the other "could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat".Chief Scientist Ian Chubb, who was the ANU's vice-chancellor at the time, last night admitted he did not have any recollection of reading the emails before relocating the university's researchers. "I don't believe I did," Professor Chubb told The Australian.
Instead, he said he had responded "as a responsible employer"."I had a bunch of concerned staff and they thought they should be moved to a more secure place so I moved them," he said."With hindsight, we can say nobody chased them down. What do you do?"The FOI application was lodged by Sydney climate blogger Simon Turnill. It requested the release of "emails, transcript of telephone calls or messages that contained abuse, threats to kill and/or threats of harm to the recipient" sent to six staff members of the ANU's Climate Change Institute. His request resulted in the discovery of the 11 documents.The university refused to release the documents, citing a clause in the Freedom of Information Act that exempts documents that "would, or could reasonably be expected to ... endanger the life or physical safety of any person" from disclosure.Mr Turnill appealed against the decision.In response to the appeal, Mr Pilgrim found 10 documents did not contain threats to kill or threats of harm.Mr Pilgrim said of the 11th, a further email offering an account of an exchange that occurred at an off-campus event sponsored by members of the Climate Change Institute and other bodies: "I consider the danger to life or physical safety in this case to be only a possibility, not a real chance."Instead, he found "the exchange as described in the email could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat".The commissioner noted in his decision that Mr Turnill had confirmed he was not seeking "the release of personal information about the people who sent or received the emails or were referred to in calls or messages".Mr Pilgrim has ordered edited version of the documents to be released. "There is no evidence to suggest disclosure would, or could reasonably be expected to, endanger the life or physical safety of any person," he said.The commissioner noted that the emails "contain insulting and offensive language" and expressed fears "there is a risk that the release of the documents could lead to further insulting or offensive communication being directed at ANU personnel or expressed through social media".But Mr Pilgrim also found: "Even if the threats were highly credible, the question would be how release of the documents would add to the expected threat."ANU Climate Institute director Will Steffen, who is also one of the government's Climate Commissioners, is believed to have been a target of the emails. Professor Steffen was overseas yesterday and unavailable for comment.The ANU has until later this month to appeal against the commissioner's decision.A university spokesman said it stood by its decision to oppose the release of the documents."We are reviewing the Privacy Commissioner's decision and considering our response," he said.Professor Chubb said he believed the tenor of the climate debate was improving."I don't get the sense that there's the same level of nastiness," he said.But he insisted "we should keep the debate civil and not threaten or intimidate whether the threats are physical violence or death".###################################################################################################################
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Death threat beat up
We covered ABC's headline from June 4 2011: Death threats sent to top climate scientists in the following post: Death threats a beat up
Report in today's Australian Newspaper confirms early suspicions: Climate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in smoke
"CLAIMS that some of Australia's leading climate change scientists were subjected to death threats as part of a vicious and unrelenting email campaign have been debunked by the Privacy Commissioner."
How long will it take ABC to provide an update?
Congratulations to Simon Turnill for persisting with an FOI request that lifted the covers on these exaggerated claims. Congratulations also to the Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim who according to The Australian "was called in to adjudicate on a Freedom of Information application in relation to Fairfax and ABC reports last June alleging that Australian National University climate change researchers were facing the ongoing campaign and had been moved to "more secure buildings" following explicit threats.
In a six-page ruling made last week, Mr Pilgrim found that 10 of 11 documents, all emails, "do not contain threats to kill" and the other "could be regarded as intimidating and at its highest perhaps alluding to a threat".
If only our own FOI requests met with similar success!
No comments:
Post a Comment