To Julie Hare email@example.com
There was so much in The Australian's budget edition of Wednesday May 9 2012.
I suggest no one picked up the trite ascientific codswallop from The Australian's newly appointed 'innovation writer.'
Science on verge of an ethical revolution The Australian Higher Education 9/5
I guess this woman represents some sort of balance to offset the common sense of other writers in The Oz.
Maybe to keep the left happy; I guess - and to get them to buy your paper.
So maybe you can faithfully say to Conroy / Gillard / Green claims to their new media body designed to control The Oz - that yours is a journal also for the true believers! Not merely the evil media of the lamentable Bob Brown.
Cheryl Jones has worked for the CSIRO - and the article is sadly a continuum of her / their social - science - view of the scientific world! It is so revealing of what her mentors at the CSIRO yearn for and proudly promulgate.
There are pathetically over 900 at CSIRO scientists studying so - called 'Climate Change Science.'
Jones plainly vitiates common sense AKA real science! Look closely what her mentors have attempted: plain old censuring one of their own! Simply astonishing!
This is best demonstrated in how the head of CSIRO Megan Clark and the lame, useless Minister for Science Kim Carr lied in claiming they did not attempt to censure an economist re his economically unacceptable ideas on Carbon trading!
It was in The Australian at the time - 2009 -2010. In full detail: o wonder Carr was eventually sacked by the hapless Gillard.
There are links galore on my website.
It was so pathetic: the article accepted Global Lunacy also known as Global Warming / conveniently rebadged by the true believers as the forever - useful / utilitarian Climate Change.
This woman seriously discusses ''..intervening in the earth's atmosphere ... [via] geo engineering.. injecting aerosols.. to cool the planet...'' This is asinine at best. I have no intention of trying to prove this: mere intelligent children would understand - the left do not.
But her raison d'etre is the eye opener: she is into ''ethicists, sociologists and psychologists in science projects...''
She quotes a professor from Arizona lovingly: "The old way of regulating the impact of technology doesn't work,"
The apparent / contrived - majority - trick is then mercilessly used by the dissemblers to imply a 'vast majority' position!
which pathetically, technically true some of the time.
[printed below #6]
why do I bother?
I have no scientific training - have only been blessed ??? merely with common sense - a
commodity scarce it would seem.
My wife still thinks I am mad - maybe she is right.
This screed is a waste of time - there is no one with common sense.
And perhaps worse - it will be passed on only to like - believing pragmatics.
And nothing will change. Did anyone notice that Cheryl Jones item was in The Higher Education section? What hope is there for us?